Skip to content
Home
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • About
  • People
  • Business Services
  • Personal Services
  • The Latest

About Shulman Rogers

About Shulman Rogers
Diversity
Community
Careers

Our People

View All Attorneys
Attorneys
Paralegals
Key Administrative Staff
Women in Law
Careers

Business Services and Industries

View All Business Services & Industries
  • Business and Financial Services
  • Cannabis Law
  • Commercial Lending
  • Employment and Labor Law
  • Entertainment Law
  • Government Contracts
  • Hospitality Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Startups and Emerging Growth Companies
  • Real Estate
  • Tax

Personal Services

View All Personal Services
  • Civil Litigation
  • Criminal Defense
  • Divorce and Family Law
  • Guardianship
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Personal Injury
  • Dental Medical Malpractice
  • Real Estate
  • Wills, Trusts, Estates and Probate
View Services A-Z
  • Home
  • About
    • About Shulman Rogers
    • Diversity
    • Community
    • Careers
  • People
    • Attorneys
    • Paralegals
    • Key Administrative Staff
    • Women in Law
    • Careers
  • Business Services
  • Personal Services
  • The Latest
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

The Latest

Employment Law Alert: New DOL Guidance Hits Pause and Rewind on Independent Contractor Crackdown

May 6, 2025


Graphic that describes "Employment Law Alert"

Employment Law Alert: New DOL Guidance Hits Pause and Rewind on Independent Contractor Crackdown

The DOL recently signaled the return to a (slightly) more flexible test for independent contractor status. This area of law is far from settled- stay tuned as we anticipate further developments.

The DOL’s latest rule related to classifying workers as employees or independent contractors under the Fair Labor Standards Act took effect on March 11, 2024 (“2024 Rule”). The 2024 Rule focused on the “economic realities” of the worker’s relationship with their employer. The 2024 Rule adopted a non-exhaustive, six-factor test with each of the factors receiving equal weight to evaluate the economic dependence of a worker on their employer. The factors are:

  1. The worker’s opportunity for profit or loss.
  2. The worker’s investment in equipment or materials required for the task.
  3. The degree of permanence of the working relationship.
  4. The nature and degree to which the employer controls how the work is done.
  5. The extent to which the service rendered is an integral part of the employer’s business.
  6. The amount of skill and initiative required.

On May 1, 2025, the DOL Wage and Hour Division (“WHD”) issued a field assistance bulletin, explaining that it is reconsidering the 2024 Rule, including whether to rescind the regulation. Thus, the WHD will no longer apply the 2024 Rule’s analysis in FLSA investigations moving forward. Rather, WHD will enforce the FLSA in accordance with Fact Sheet #13 from July 2008, further informed by Opinion Letter FLSA 2025-2.

The July 2008 test looks at the “total activity or situation which controls.” The factors examined include:

  1. The extent to which the services rendered are an integral part of the principal’s business.
  2. The permanency of the relationship.
  3. The amount of the alleged contractor’s investment in facilities and equipment.
  4. The nature and degree of control by the principal.
  5. The alleged contractor’s opportunities for profit and loss.
  6. The amount of initiative, judgment or foresight required in open market competition with others for the success of the claimed independent contractor.
  7. The degree of independent business organization and operation.

At first glance, while many of the factors appear substantially similar to the 2024 Rule, we anticipate the DOL is signaling its intention to revert to a more flexible, employer-friendly test.

Notably, however, until further action is taken, the 2024 Rule remains in effect for purposes of private litigation. Additionally, employers should remain mindful of the federal and state law variances in how classification is construed. For example, California makes notable distinctions governing worker classification. Additionally, this DOL bulletin does not impact current worker classification analysis conducted by other federal agencies, such as pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, the National Labor Relations Act or other federal laws.

Please do not hesitate to reach out for assistance related to employee classification.

CONTACT

Meredith “Merry” Campbell

Joy C. Einstein

Alexander I. Castelli

Drew T. Ricci

Lauren M. Upton

MORE INFORMATION

The contents of this Alert are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about this Alert, please contact the Shulman Rogers attorney with whom you regularly work or a member of the Shulman Rogers Employment and Labor Law Group.

To receive Employment Law Alerts and other timely news and information from Shulman Rogers, please click HERE to subscribe.

Stay up to date with all the latest news and events.

Receive Our Newsletter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Receive our Newsletter
12505 Park Potomac Avenue
Potomac, MD 20854
PH: 301-230-5200
8200 Greensboro Drive
Suite 701
McLean, VA 22102
PH: 703-684-5200
1100 New York Avenue NW
West Tower, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20005
PH: 202-872-0400
277 South Washington Street
Suite 310
Alexandria, VA 22314
PH: 703-682-8267
The Banner Building at McHenry Row
1215 East Fort Avenue, Suite 301
Baltimore, MD 21230
PH: 410-520-1340
  • © 2025 Shulman Rogers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Careers
  • Contact Us